If you read this blog regularly, you are probably aware of global warming and its catastrophic consequences. But, perhaps, you know someone who isn't. Or someone in your social network who is sitting on the fence. Pass this along please. Dont make me start on about civil rights and the power of grassroots movements again.
http://view.break.com/311805 - Watch more free videos
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Monday, June 04, 2007
Fuck you Im a disgruntled Democrat
Huzzah.
Whilst Hilary is claiming that her 'faith' got her through Bill's affair, King Bush has fucked your YOUR constitution up the ass. Yet another method for the the Bush administration to get around the whole checks and balances nonsense that our founding fathers so ostensibly laid out for us.
Thats right kids! Your hopes of Democracy have been flushed down the toilet and you probably (yet again) had no fucking clue! Why? Because the media wont report on it. Instead, we are being bombarded with stories about Paris Hilton and the ways in which Dems are selling out to get undereducated peons to vote for them.
Hey! At least they are losing the battle to keep prisoners of war without charge.
BTW I'm writing Jack Kevorkian a thank you email this evening. He continues to defend our 9th amendment rights, and has served hard time for the cause. Now thats a fucking American.
Whilst Hilary is claiming that her 'faith' got her through Bill's affair, King Bush has fucked your YOUR constitution up the ass. Yet another method for the the Bush administration to get around the whole checks and balances nonsense that our founding fathers so ostensibly laid out for us.
Thats right kids! Your hopes of Democracy have been flushed down the toilet and you probably (yet again) had no fucking clue! Why? Because the media wont report on it. Instead, we are being bombarded with stories about Paris Hilton and the ways in which Dems are selling out to get undereducated peons to vote for them.
Hey! At least they are losing the battle to keep prisoners of war without charge.
BTW I'm writing Jack Kevorkian a thank you email this evening. He continues to defend our 9th amendment rights, and has served hard time for the cause. Now thats a fucking American.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Despair.
How fucking emo.
This is exhausting. After all of these years of utter hopelessness, were back to square one.
Our government is broken. I'm not sure that it can be fixed.
Im painfully sick of being depressed about this.
So- Im applying to colleges in Western Europe. I thought it would be quite romantic to gain amnesty in the Netherlands, but its unnecessary. They'll grant me citizenship with fairly little hassle and only a short waiting period.
Its just too much. We are too far gone.
This is exhausting. After all of these years of utter hopelessness, were back to square one.
Our government is broken. I'm not sure that it can be fixed.
Im painfully sick of being depressed about this.
So- Im applying to colleges in Western Europe. I thought it would be quite romantic to gain amnesty in the Netherlands, but its unnecessary. They'll grant me citizenship with fairly little hassle and only a short waiting period.
Its just too much. We are too far gone.
Sunday, May 13, 2007
I'm important
To Barbara Boxer.
Or 100 million people also emailed her with a request to impeach Dick Cheney.
(I recieved this automatic e-mail response from her- which hardly ever happens. Mind you I email these jerks AT LEAST once a week)
"senator@boxer.senate.gov"
to me
May 9 (4 days ago)
Dear Miss Atkinson:
Thank you for contacting me regarding H.Res.333, a resolution to impeach Vice President Richard B. Cheney. I appreciate hearing from you.
Our Constitution requires that impeachment proceedings begin in the House of Representatives. The House must vote for impeachment before presenting its case to the Senate. The Senate then holds a trial to consider the case for impeachment.
H.Res.333 is currently being considered by the House Judiciary Committee. Should H.Res.333 reach the Senate, please know that I will fulfill my Constitutional duty to the best of my ability by considering all of the facts in the case - and there certainly are many!
Again, thank you for writing to me. Please do not hesitate to contact me again about this or any other issue of concern to you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
Well, duh Miss Boxer. Believe me, I have bombarded these dudes with phone calls, emails and even hand written letters.
Or 100 million people also emailed her with a request to impeach Dick Cheney.
(I recieved this automatic e-mail response from her- which hardly ever happens. Mind you I email these jerks AT LEAST once a week)
"senator@boxer.senate.gov"
to me
May 9 (4 days ago)
Dear Miss Atkinson:
Thank you for contacting me regarding H.Res.333, a resolution to impeach Vice President Richard B. Cheney. I appreciate hearing from you.
Our Constitution requires that impeachment proceedings begin in the House of Representatives. The House must vote for impeachment before presenting its case to the Senate. The Senate then holds a trial to consider the case for impeachment.
H.Res.333 is currently being considered by the House Judiciary Committee. Should H.Res.333 reach the Senate, please know that I will fulfill my Constitutional duty to the best of my ability by considering all of the facts in the case - and there certainly are many!
Again, thank you for writing to me. Please do not hesitate to contact me again about this or any other issue of concern to you.
Barbara Boxer
United States Senator
Well, duh Miss Boxer. Believe me, I have bombarded these dudes with phone calls, emails and even hand written letters.
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Enough Already.
So the house has devised and passed yet another bill that ape we call commander in chief promises to veto.
It continues to threaten the American populace with promises of abandoning the troops. This blame supposedly will land square on the shoulders of anti-war dems, AKA rational people who have been sworn to protect and may have actually read the constitution.
HOW FUCKING STUPID DOES THE MURDER THINK WE ARE? How ignorant of current events is his cabinet? I'm sick to death of commentators stating the dems must back down for fear of 30- second commercials illustrating their refusal to support the the troops AFTER they get fired. First off, if the dems get us out of Iraq, even if it means pulling the financial plug, they are doing what the American people are screaming for. Second, they do support the troops. This phrase needs to be revamped. It isn't an empty saying for those who have an American flag outside their home, a rifle in the closet, and no clue of what their bill of rights entitles them to. No, support includes a rational person who sees there was never a need for us to be in Iraq. Support means a financial backing to remove troops and stop the "surge". Recognize- The people who raise their hands in our House and Senate, those who have the spine to stand up to the ape and lackeys will be heroes.
Lets not forget, the repugs have not supported the people fighting this war. The last Veto is simply one event in a string of many that prove they never have. Our people in Iraq have never had the proper training, equipment or even rationale in this "war on terror". They have not been proper health or financial care upon their return.
Lets stop fucking around and either impeach or assassinate.
*kiss*
It continues to threaten the American populace with promises of abandoning the troops. This blame supposedly will land square on the shoulders of anti-war dems, AKA rational people who have been sworn to protect and may have actually read the constitution.
HOW FUCKING STUPID DOES THE MURDER THINK WE ARE? How ignorant of current events is his cabinet? I'm sick to death of commentators stating the dems must back down for fear of 30- second commercials illustrating their refusal to support the the troops AFTER they get fired. First off, if the dems get us out of Iraq, even if it means pulling the financial plug, they are doing what the American people are screaming for. Second, they do support the troops. This phrase needs to be revamped. It isn't an empty saying for those who have an American flag outside their home, a rifle in the closet, and no clue of what their bill of rights entitles them to. No, support includes a rational person who sees there was never a need for us to be in Iraq. Support means a financial backing to remove troops and stop the "surge". Recognize- The people who raise their hands in our House and Senate, those who have the spine to stand up to the ape and lackeys will be heroes.
Lets not forget, the repugs have not supported the people fighting this war. The last Veto is simply one event in a string of many that prove they never have. Our people in Iraq have never had the proper training, equipment or even rationale in this "war on terror". They have not been proper health or financial care upon their return.
Lets stop fucking around and either impeach or assassinate.
*kiss*
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Sure.
The Republican loaded supreme court has decided to start making rules about my uterus. Fucking fantastic.
Lets consider who is dictating morality to us. This a party who put into a power a states attorney who apparently has Alzheimer's disease. Alberto Gonzalez is a liar, another Bush Cronie. No, don't let him resign. He will still receive all of the benefits of his years off ass licking and lying to the American people. Sure- lets talk about lying! George Bush not only lied, but fabricated evidence so that the US would invade Iraq and make his religous zealots and money whores quite happy. These are the people telling me when I can and cannot control my own fucking body?
In other GOOD news, We are finally going after THE ARCHITECT Carl Rove for his crimes against the United States. Is it time to Impeach yet? I suppose shall see after Bushie Veto's our 'end the occupation' bill.
I did a cool survey today, I'm way bored. Supposedly, Im a 'secular humanist'. Do you know any humanists that aren't secular? I mean real humanists, not the pick and choose kind.
Defined-
• Belief in Deity
Not considered important. Most Humanists are atheists or agnostics.
• Incarnations
Same as above.
• Origin of Universe and Life
The scientific method is most respected as the means for revealing the mysteries of the origins of the universe and life.
• After Death
An afterlife or spiritual existence after death is not recognized.
• Why Evil?
No concept of “evil.” Reasons for wrongdoing are explored through scientific methods, e.g. through study of sociology, psychology, criminology.
• Salvation
No concept of afterlife or spiritual liberation or salvation. Realizing ones personal potential and working for the betterment of humanity through ethical consciousness and social works are considered paramount, but from a naturalistic rather than supernatural standpoint.
• Undeserved Suffering
No spiritual reasons but rather a matter of human vulnerability to misfortune, illness, and victimization.
• Contemporary Issues
The American Humanist Association endorses elective abortion. Other contemporary views include working for equality for homosexuals, gender equality, a secular approach to divorce and remarriage, working to end poverty, promoting peace and nonviolence, and environmental protection.
Try it.
Lets consider who is dictating morality to us. This a party who put into a power a states attorney who apparently has Alzheimer's disease. Alberto Gonzalez is a liar, another Bush Cronie. No, don't let him resign. He will still receive all of the benefits of his years off ass licking and lying to the American people. Sure- lets talk about lying! George Bush not only lied, but fabricated evidence so that the US would invade Iraq and make his religous zealots and money whores quite happy. These are the people telling me when I can and cannot control my own fucking body?
In other GOOD news, We are finally going after THE ARCHITECT Carl Rove for his crimes against the United States. Is it time to Impeach yet? I suppose shall see after Bushie Veto's our 'end the occupation' bill.
I did a cool survey today, I'm way bored. Supposedly, Im a 'secular humanist'. Do you know any humanists that aren't secular? I mean real humanists, not the pick and choose kind.
Defined-
• Belief in Deity
Not considered important. Most Humanists are atheists or agnostics.
• Incarnations
Same as above.
• Origin of Universe and Life
The scientific method is most respected as the means for revealing the mysteries of the origins of the universe and life.
• After Death
An afterlife or spiritual existence after death is not recognized.
• Why Evil?
No concept of “evil.” Reasons for wrongdoing are explored through scientific methods, e.g. through study of sociology, psychology, criminology.
• Salvation
No concept of afterlife or spiritual liberation or salvation. Realizing ones personal potential and working for the betterment of humanity through ethical consciousness and social works are considered paramount, but from a naturalistic rather than supernatural standpoint.
• Undeserved Suffering
No spiritual reasons but rather a matter of human vulnerability to misfortune, illness, and victimization.
• Contemporary Issues
The American Humanist Association endorses elective abortion. Other contemporary views include working for equality for homosexuals, gender equality, a secular approach to divorce and remarriage, working to end poverty, promoting peace and nonviolence, and environmental protection.
Try it.
Monday, April 02, 2007
Where is the media?
Why the hell isn't this in the news?
"U.S. court rules against Bush in global warming case
Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:33PM EDT
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a defeat for the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a U.S. government agency has the power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions that spur global warming.
By a 5-4 vote, the nation's highest court said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "has offered no reasoned explanation" for its refusal to regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions from new cars and trucks that contribute to climate change.
The ruling in one of the most important environmental cases to reach the Supreme Court marked the first high court decision in a case involving global warming.
President George W. Bush has opposed mandatory controls on greenhouse gases as harmful to the U.S. economy, and the administration has called for voluntary programs instead of regulation. The states and environmental groups that brought the lawsuit hailed the ruling.
"As a result of today's landmark ruling, EPA can no longer hide behind the fiction that it lacks any regulatory authority to address the problem of global warming," Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said." Cont...
Its not on CNN, MSNBC, BBC- WHERE IS EVERYBODY?
"U.S. court rules against Bush in global warming case
Mon Apr 2, 2007 1:33PM EDT
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a defeat for the Bush administration, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a U.S. government agency has the power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions that spur global warming.
By a 5-4 vote, the nation's highest court said the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency "has offered no reasoned explanation" for its refusal to regulate carbon dioxide and other emissions from new cars and trucks that contribute to climate change.
The ruling in one of the most important environmental cases to reach the Supreme Court marked the first high court decision in a case involving global warming.
President George W. Bush has opposed mandatory controls on greenhouse gases as harmful to the U.S. economy, and the administration has called for voluntary programs instead of regulation. The states and environmental groups that brought the lawsuit hailed the ruling.
"As a result of today's landmark ruling, EPA can no longer hide behind the fiction that it lacks any regulatory authority to address the problem of global warming," Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said." Cont...
Its not on CNN, MSNBC, BBC- WHERE IS EVERYBODY?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
